Perpendicular magnetization switching by large spin–orbit torques from sputtered Bi2Te3
Zheng Zhenyi1, 2, 3, Zhang Yue1, †, Zhu Daoqian1, Zhang Kun1, Feng Xueqiang1, He Yu1, Chen Lei1, Zhang Zhizhong1, 2, Liu Dijun2, Zhang Youguang1, 2, Amiri Pedram Khalili3, Zhao Weisheng1, ‡
Fert Beijing Research Institute, BDBC, School of Microelectronics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: yz@buaa.edu.cn weisheng.zhao@buaa.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61971024and 51901008), Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (Grant No. 2017QNRC001), the International Mobility Project (Grant No. B16001), and National Key Technology Program of China (Grant No. 2017ZX01032101). P.K.A. acknowledges support by a grant from the National Science Foundation, Divisionof Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (NSF ECCS-1853879).

Abstract

Spin–orbit torque (SOT) effect is considered as an efficient way to switch the magnetization and can inspire various high-performance spintronic devices. Recently, topological insulators (TIs) have gained extensive attention, as they are demonstrated to maintain a large effective spin Hall angle (), even at room temperature. However, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), as a precise deposition method, is required to guarantee favorable surface states of TIs, which hinders the prospect of TIs towards industrial application. In this paper, we demonstrate that Bi2Te3 films grown by magnetron sputtering can provide a notable SOT effect in the heterostructure with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy CoTb ferrimagnetic alloy. By harmonic Hall measurement, a high SOT efficiency (8.7 ± 0.9 Oe/(109 A/m2)) and a large (3.3±0.3) are obtained at room temperature. Besides, we also observe an ultra-low critical switching current density (9.7×109 A/m2). Moreover, the low-power characteristic of the sputtered Bi2Te3 film is investigated by drawing a comparison with different sputtered SOT sources. Our work may provide an alternative to leverage chalcogenides as a realistic and efficient SOT source in future spintronic devices.

1. Introduction

Physical mechanisms leading to controllable and stable magnetization switching are considered as the core of spintronic devices with high performance.[14] In recent years, researchers have found that, by applying a current through the cross-section of a non-magnetic metal (NM)/ferromagnetic metal (FM) bilayer structure, the spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) can provide strong spin torques to switch the adjacent magnetic layer via the spin–orbit torque (SOT) effect.[57] This method serves as a more efficient way to switch the magnetization than the spin-transfer torque (STT) effect and is expected to inspire a variety of high-speed and multifunctional spintronic devices.[813]

The most common spin generators in NM/FM bilayers are heavy metals (HMs), such as Ta, W, Pt, Hf, since bulk SOIs in heavier elements are much more significant.[14,15] However, the effective spin Hall angle of HM is limited, leading to a relatively high critical magnetization switching current density jsw on the order of 1011–1012 A/m.[57,15] Furthermore, with regard to certain high-performance bulk magnets, such as ferrimagnetic alloys,[8] Heusler alloys,[16] magnetic insulators,[17] featuring a larger thickness, jsw is expected to be further increased to get over the augmenting anisotropic energy barrier. These facts seriously hinder the realization of low power consumption. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate novel NM materials with larger such as topological insulators (TIs),[1820] two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG),[21,22] oxidized HMs,[23,24] and so on. Among those materials, TIs (including Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, Bi0.9Sb0.1, (BiSb)2Te3) exhibit great potential for application, thanks to the large SOTs induced by the spin–momentum locking on their surfaces at room temperature. For instance, a several-nm-thick magnetic layer can be switched by SOTs from Bi2Se3 or Bi0.9Sb0.1 with a jsw of 1010 A/m,[19,20,25] while with (BiSb)2Te3, jsw could even be reduced to the order of 109 A/m.[26] Note that all those reported TI samples are grown on single-crystal substrates with an ultra-precise growing method of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) to form excellent topological surface states (TSS). This method is acceptable at laboratory level, but incompatible with industrial memory or logic fabrication process. To resolve this obstacle, sputtered Bi2Se3 films on oxidized silicon substrate are recently reported to possess a great and can efficiently switch the adjacent ferromagnet at room temperature.[27,28] Magnetron sputtering is commonly used in semiconductor industry and therefore offers a possibility to introduce typical TI-related chalcogenides with enhanced SOT into large-scale application. Nevertheless, few similar materials are reported so far to maintain large through this method.

In this paper, we report that Bi2Te3 films sputtered on oxidized silicon substrate can exhibit a remarkable SOT effect. By applying harmonic Hall measurement in Bi2Te3/CoTb bilayer, in this system is determined as large as 3.3± 0.3 at room temperature. Then, current-induced switching of a 6-nm-thick perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) CoTb ferrimagnetic alloy is also realized in the mentioned structure. Compared with traditional HMs, jsw as well as the power consumption to switch the magnetic layer can be reduced by more than one order.

2. Method

The samples in our work are deposited on thermally oxidized Si substrates using DC or RF magnetron sputtering under a base pressure better than 2×10−8 Torr. We first deposited a series of substrate/MgO (2 nm)/Bi2Te3 (t nm)/MgO (1 nm) stacks with t varying from 5 nm to 40 nm for the four-point resistivity measurements. Figure 1(a) shows that the resistivity of the sputtered Bi2Te3 has a downward trend versus its thickness t. This trend is similar to those in previously reported TI materials[20] and can be explained by the combined effect of surface conduct and bulk conduct properties in Bi2Te3.[29] To guarantee a relatively good as well as enough passing current through the cross-section, 8-nm-thick Bi2Te3 layer with a resistivity of 3011 μΩ⋅cm is chosen for the SOT experiments in our work. This Bi2Te3 layer should have a polycrystalline structure, and the roughness characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM) is shown in the inset of Fig. 1(a). The root mean square value of the surface roughness is 0.35 nm, which is smooth enough for the following heterostructure deposition.

Fig. 1. (a) Thickness-dependent resistivity change measured by four-point method in MgO/Bi2Te3/MgO trilayers. Inset is an AFM image of Bi2Te3 (8 nm) sample. (b) Stack schematic of the investigated Bi2Te3/CoTb heterostructure. (c) Dependence of the magnetization direction of CoTb layer on x. When x is in the range of 6–8 nm, CoTb layers show excellent PMA properties.

In addition, a ferrimagnetic rare-earth-transition–metal alloy CoTb, in which Co and Tb sub-lattices are coupled anti-ferromagnetically, is used as the adjacent magnetic layer for two reasons: 1) CoTb alloy possesses robust bulk PMA within a large thickness range, and bulk PMA magnets present better switching performance and thermal stability in real device applications;[19,30] 2) CoTb alloy has a relatively high resistivity (206 μΩ⋅cm), allowing more current to pass through the Bi2Te3 layer. Here, CoTb is deposited by the co-sputtering of Co and Tb targets. By tuning the chemical composition or temperature, CoTb could approach angular momentum compensation point or magnetization compensation point, and exhibits plenty of charming magnetic properties.[3032] However, few evidences yet support that CoTb approaching compensation point could contribute to increase in the whole system. Therefore, we use a Co-rich chemical composition, i.e., Co0.83Tb0.17, throughout our whole work, which is estimated by the independent deposition speed of Co and Tb. As shown in Fig. 1(b), a series of substrate/MgO (2 nm)/Bi2Te3 (8 nm)/CoTb (x nm)/Ta (1.5 nm) stacks are deposited. It can be found that the capping Ta layers are fully oxidized and not involved in the SOT switching process.[33] Vibration sample magnetometry is utilized to determine the magnetic anisotropies of all the samples. As illustrated in Fig. 1(c), when x ranges from 3 nm to 12 nm, the magnetization direction of the CoTb varies from in-plane to out-of-plane, and tends to go slightly back to the in-plane state when x reaches 12 nm.

For electrical measurements, we choose the 6-nm-thick CoTb sample, since it possesses good PMA when the magnetic layer remains relatively thin. The net magnetization Ms of this 6-nm-thick CoTb layer is 215 emu/cc. By typical lithography and ion beam etching, the sample is fabricated into 5-μm-width Hall bar device. Keithley 6221 current source and 2182 voltage-meter are used to implement AHE and SOT switching experiments. To measure the SOT efficiency, harmonics Hall measurement is then implemented by injecting an AC current of 133.33 Hz along x axis. Two SR830 lock-in amplifiers are used to detect the harmonic signals.

3. Result and discussion

Figure 2(a) shows the fabricated device with gold electrodes and the basic electrical measurement schematic. The anomalous Hall effect (AHE) resistance versus the applied out-of-plane magnetic field is plotted in Fig. 2(b). Squared loop and similar coercive field confirm that the stack maintains its as-deposited magnetic properties. Figure 2(c) plots the curves of the first and the second harmonic voltages, i.e., R1ω and Rx(y), 2ω versus the in-plane magnetic field Hx(y). A ratio coefficient Bx(y) could be firstly calculated with the respective curvature of R1ω and the slope of Vx(y), 2ω[34,35]

Then, the damping-like HDL and field-like effective field HFL can be determined by the following expression:[34,35]

where ξ is the ratio of planar Hall resistance RPHE and AHE resistance RAHE. The measured RPHE in our samples is about 0.06 Ω, which is much smaller than RAHE and thus can be negligible. In this occasion, HDL(FL) ≈ –2Bx(y). Moreover, it also should be noticed that Rx,2ω induced by the field along x axis is much larger than Ry,2ω induced by the field along y axis, even if Ry,2ω is amplified by 3 times in Fig. 2(c). This phenomenon indicates that the induced HFL is negligible compared to the induced HDL; for this reason, we concentrate on the damping-like SOT effect in the following discussion.

Fig. 2. (a) Image of 5-μm-width Hall bar device with electrical measurement setup. (b) Anomalous Hall resistance curve of Bi2Te3 (8 nm)/CoTb (6 nm) sample. (c) Harmonics resistance curve with applied in-plane magnetic field. Hx-induced damping-like signal (red points) is much larger than Hy-induced field-like signals (blue circles, amplified by 3 times). (d) Effective damping-like field as a linear function of current density in Bi2Te3 layer.

Figure 2(d) shows the calculated HDL as a function of applied charge current density jc in the Bi2Te3 layer. Here, jc is calculated by a parallel circuit model of Bi2Te3/CoTb bilayer, which can be written as

where ρCoTb, ρBi2Te3, tCoTb, tBi2Te3, wHall Bar and I represent the resistivity of CoTb, resistivity of Bi2Te3, thickness of CoTb, thickness of Bi2Te3, width of Hall bar, and injected current, respectively. HDL augments linearly with the increasing current density, revealing that Joule heating effect is negligible in the measured current density range.[32] In the investigated Bi2Te3/CoTb sample, the determined current-induced SOT efficiency χ (defined by HDL / jc) is 8.7± 0.9 Oe/(109 A/m2). Although the applied CoTb is far from its magnetic compensation point, the obtained value is surprisingly high. For comparison, χ in W/CoTb/AlOx structure in our previous work is about 0.4 ± 0.04 Oe/(109 A/m2),[8] while χ in a conventional Ta/CoFeB/MgO structure is 0.2–0.9 Oe/(109 A/m2).[36,37] This outstanding χ indicates that strong SOTs are expected in the sputtered Bi2Te3 layer. We also calculate the in this system by the following expression:[3033]

where tCoTb is thickness of CoTb. The obtained , which exceeds 100 % and is competitive with the results in MBE-grown TIs.[1820] In addition, it is worth mentioning that there might be spin loss at the interface between Bi2Te3 and CoTb. Given this fact, even a larger intrinsic spin Hall angle could be expected in our sputtered Bi2Te3 films.

Current-induced magnetization switching at room temperature is demonstrated as well and plotted in Figs. 3(a) and 3(d). Here, a series of 0.1-ms-width current pulses are applied to switch the magnet, while a 400 Oe in-plane magnetic field is used to break the magnetization precession symmetry. The jsw to switch 6-nm-thick CoTb is about 9.7×109 A/m2. This value is one or two orders lower than that in typical HM-based heterostructure,[58] confirming again the existence of strong SOTs in the sputtered Bi2Te3. When the direction of the applied in-plane field is reversed, the switching polarity of the curve changes as expected in the theoretical SOT switching framework. We also notice that the variation of SOT-driven RAHE (∼ 1.6 Ω) is smaller than that of magnetic-field-driven RAHE (∼ 2.1 Ω), revealing a partial switching phenomenon (76 % magnetization). This difference is also observed in previous switching results with MBE-grown TIs and can be explained by the Joule-heating-caused demagnetization in CoTb layer.[26] We are convinced that reducing shunting current in CoTb layer by reasonable device design could efficiently eliminate the problem.

Fig. 3. Current-induced switching curves of Bi2Te3/CoTb under an in-plane magnetic field Hx = 400 Oe (a) and –400 Oe (e). (b)–(c) The AHE curves of Pt/CoTb, Ta/CoTb, and W/CoTb samples, respectively. (f)–(h) The current-induced switching curves of Pt/CoTb, Ta/CoTb, and W/CoTb samples under Hx = 400 Oe. The different switching polarities reveal different spin Hall angle signs.

To better evaluate the SOT performance of the sputtered Bi2Te3 sample, some control samples based on conventional sputtered SOT sources (Pt, Ta, W) are also studied with a stack structure of HM (5 nm)/CoTb (4 nm). While maintaining the same chemical composition and Ms, the thickness of CoTb is reduced in these samples, since SOTs originating from common HMs can hardly switch magnets with large thickness. As shown in Figs. 3(b)3(d), all the control samples have squared RAHE loops versus perpendicular magnetic field, indicating that they possess good PMA properties. Besides, because of the different shunting effects of Bi2Te3, Pt, Ta, and W, RAHE in the four samples are not consistent. Figures 3(f)3(h) illustrate the current-induced magnetization switching curves of Pt/CoTb, Ta/CoTb, and W/CoTb samples. In these experiments, the applied in-plane magnetic field is fixed to + 400 Oe to guarantee a more reasonable comparison. We observe similar RAHE in current-induced switching and field-induced switching for each sample, revealing that the aforementioned partial switching phenomenon barely exists in HM based samples. Regarding the calculation of current density, the resistivity of Pt, Ta, and W is measured to be 27 μΩ⋅cm, 112 μΩ⋅cm, and 151 μΩ⋅cm, respectively. We find that the values of jsw to switch 4-nm-CoTb for Pt, Ta, and W are approximately 5.5×1011 A/m2, 2.3 × 1011 A/m2, and 1.7×1011 A/m2. All those critical current densities are consistent with previously reported values[58] and are obviously much larger than those in our Bi2Te3/CoTb system, although CoTb in Bi2Te3 based sample is even thicker, i.e., 6 nm. Note that, under an in-plane field with fixed direction, the switching polarity in Bi2Te3 sample is in line with that in Ta or W samples, which is opposite to that in Pt sample. This SOT polarity characteristic indicates that our sputtered Bi2Te3 possesses the same spin Hall angle sign as Ta and W, but is opposite to Pt. Nevertheless, this phenomenon is in contradiction with SOTs in previous-reported Bi-based materials: both MBE-grown TIs and sputtered Bi2Se3 films are demonstrated to have the same sign as Pt.[19,20,2527] The origin of this difference will be discussed subsequently. In our work, values of of Pt, Ta, and W in Fig. 4(a) are determined as 0.07± 0.007, 0.14± 0.01, and 0.18± 0.02, through previously mentioned harmonic measurement and Eq. (4). In accordance with the varying jsw values in those SOT materials, these calculated values are quite reliable and accepted in our following discussion.

Fig. 4. (a) Effective spin Hall angles of sputtered Pt, Ta, W, and Bi2Te3. (b) Normalized power consumption to switch the magnetization of CoTb per unit volume by different SOT source materials. The black bars and orange bars correspond respectively to the calculation formulas related to and jsw.

Essentially, improving the magnetization switching energy efficiency is the eventual goal of obtaining higher . Considering that the resistivity of our sputtered Bi2Te3 is similar to that of MBE-grown TIs and can be dozens, even hundreds of times higher than that of conventional HMs, we think that it is significant to figure out whether the sputtered Bi2Te3 indeed offers energy superiority by calculating the switching power consumption P. Basically, P to switch the magnetization of CoTb per unit volume with different SOT sources can be analyzed by a heat dissipation formula[27]

where ρSOT source is the resistivity of the certain SOT source material. As shown by orange bars in Fig. 4(b), the power consumption for Bi2Te3 in this model is 3.7 %, 3.2 %, and 3.9 % of that for Pt, Ta, and W, indicating that sputtered Bi2Te3 is a low-power SOT source. Furthermore, since theoretically, another formula is considered as well to confirm the results[19]

Black bars in Fig. 4(b) reveal that, although the calculated power of Pt, Ta, W with Eq. (5) varies in a possible range compared to those values with Eq. (4), the sputtered Bi2Te3 material still shows the best energy efficiency performance (2.8 %, 3.5 %, and 4.3 % of that for Pt, Ta, and W).

Last but not least, we will discuss about the origin of the strong SOTs in the sputtered Bi2Te3 films. In MBE-grown TIs, SOTs basically come from the spin–momentum locking in TSS. Thus, great surface quality is the basic precondition to gain large . However, good TSS definitely will not appear in the deposited Bi2Te3 films, since magnetron sputtering is a rapid and rough growing method. Generally, there are two possible reasons to answer this question: 1) sputtered Bi chalcogenides could possibly possess nanoscale grain structure. Some ab initio calculation results suggest that this reduced dimensionality may contribute to the non-equilibrium spin accumulation driven by intraband Edelstein effect.[27] 2) It is also possible that remarkable SOIs already exist in the sputtered Bi2Te3 films with relatively high resistivity and heavy elements. To further analyze the possible origin, an important point is that, the observed spin Hall angle sign of our sputtered Bi2Te3 films is opposite to that in MBE-grown TIs (same as Pt). Another recent work also reports a similar result: sputtered WxTe1 – x films possess opposite spin Hall angle sign to WTe2 single crystals.[3840] However, for related Se-based material, the sputtered Bi2Se3 films have the same spin Hall angle to the MBE-grown Bi2Se3.[27,28] Those evidences indicate that sputtered Te-based films probably exhibit different SOT mechanisms to sputtered Se-based films, although they both belong to the Bi chalcogenide class. Besides, the opposite spin Hall angle signs of sputtered Bi2Te3 and MBE-grown Bi2Te3 also exclude the possibility of major origin from TSS. Therefore, considering that both sputtered Te-based materials[38] and Bi-based chalcogenides[27] are reported to have obvious thickness-dependent spin Hall angle, the second reason attached to intrinsic bulk spin Hall effect is more convincing from our perspective.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we investigate SOTs in Bi2Te3 films grown by an industry-compatible deposition method magnetron sputtering. A high SOT efficiency χ (8.7± 0.9 Oe/(109 A/m2)) and a remarkable (3.3± 0.3) are obtained in Bi2Te3/CoTb heterostructure as shown by harmonic Hall measurement. In addition, an ultra-low current switching current density (9.7×109 A/m2 to switch 6-nm-thick PMA CoTb) is achieved as well. Compared with other sputtered SOT sources, the sputtered Bi2Te3 in our work shows much higher energy efficiency, indicating that it is a promising candidate in future SOT spintronic devices. Our work may also provide an alternative route to introduce more laboratory-level high-performance chalcogenides in industry-level spintronic applications.

Reference
[1] Slonczewski J C 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159 L1
[2] Wadley P Howells B Železný J Andrews C Hills V Campion R P Novák V Olejník K Maccherozzi F Dhesi S S Martin S Y Wagner T Wunderlich J Freimuth F Mokrousov Y Kuneš J Chauhan J S Grzybowski M J Rushforth A W Edmonds K W Gallagher B L Jungwirth T 2016 Science 351 587
[3] Chen X Zhou X Cheng R Song C Zhang J Wu Y Ba Y Li H Sun Y You Y Zhao Y Pan F 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 931
[4] Yang T Kimura T Otani Y 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 851
[5] Liu L Pai C F Li Y Tseng H W Ralph D C Buhrman R A 2012 Science 336 555
[6] Miron I M Garello K Gaudin G Zermatten P G Costache M V Auffret S Bandiera S Rodmacq B Schuhl A Gambardella P 2011 Nature 476 189
[7] Yu G Upadhyaya P Fan Y Alzate J G Jiang W Wong K L Takei S Bender S A Chang L T Jiang Y Lang M Tang J Wang Y Tserkovnyak Y Amiri P K Wang K L 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 548
[8] Zheng Z Zhang Y Feng X Zhang K Nan J Zhang Z Wang G Wang J Lei N Liu D Zhang Y G Zhao W S 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 044032
[9] Sato N Xue F White R M Bi C Wang S X 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 508
[10] Zhang Z Zhu Y Zhang Y Zhang K Nan J Zheng Z Zhang Y G Zhao W S 2019 IEEE Electron. Device. Lett. 40 1984
[11] Zhang K Zhang Y Zhang Z Zheng Z Wang G Zhang Y G Liu Q Yan S Zhao W S 2019 Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 1800812
[12] Wang M Cai W Zhu D Wang Z Kan J Zhao Z Cao K Wang Z Zhang Y Zhang T Park C Wang J P Fert A Zhao W S 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 582
[13] Zheng C Chen H Zhang X Zhang Z Liu Y 2019 Chin. Phys. 28 037503
[14] Feng X Zhang Q Zhang H Zhang Y Zhong R Lu B Cao J Fan X 2019 Chin. Phys. 28 107105
[15] Ramaswamy R Qiu X Dutta T Pollard S D Yang H 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 202406
[16] Finley J Lee C H Huang P Y Liu L 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1805361
[17] Li P Liu T Chang H Kalitsov A Zhang W Csaba G Li W Richardson D DeMann A Rimal G Dey H Jiang J S Porod W Field S Tang J Marconi M C Hoffmann A Mryasov O Wu M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12688
[18] Mellnik A R Lee J S Richardella A Grab J L Mintun P J Fischer M H Vaezi A Manchon A Kim E A Samarth N Ralph D C 2014 Nature 511 449
[19] Han J Richardella A Siddiqui S A Finley J Samarth N Liu L 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 077702
[20] Wang Y Zhu D Wu Y Yang Y Yu J Ramaswamy R Mishra R Shi S Elyasi M Teo K L Wu Y Yang H 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1
[21] Yang H Zhang B Zhang X Yan X Cai W Zhao Y Sun J Wang K L Zhu D Zhao W S 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 034004
[22] Ohtomo A Hwang H Y 2004 Nature 427 423
[23] Kageyama Y Tazaki Y An H Harumoto T Gao T Shi J Ando K 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax4278
[24] An H Ohno T Kanno Y Kageyama Y Monnai Y Maki H Ando K 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaar2250
[25] Khang N H D Ueda Y Hai P N 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 808
[26] Wu H Xu Y Deng P Pan Q Razavi S A Wong K Huang L Dai B Shao Q Yu G Han X Sánchez J C R Mangin S Wang K L 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1901681
[27] Mahendra D C Grassi R Chen J Jamali M Hickey D R Zhang D Zhao Z Li H Quarterman P Lv Y Li M Manchon A Mkhoyan K A Low T Wang J P 2018 Nat. Mater 17 800
[28] Zhang X Cui B Mao J Yun J Yan Z Chang M Zuo Y Xi L 2020 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 14 2000033
[29] Sourabh B Rajeev K P 2014 AIP Adv. 4 017135
[30] Finley J Liu L 2016 Phys. Rev. Appl. 6 054001
[31] Ueda K Mann M de Brouwer P W P Bono D Beach G S D 2017 Phys. Rev. 96 064410
[32] Je S G Sánchez J C R Pham T H Vallobra P Malinowski G Lacour D Fache T Cyrille M C Kim D Y Choe S B Belmeguenai M Hehn M Mangin S Gaudin G Boulle O 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 062401
[33] Woo S Mann M Tan A J Caretta L Beach G S D 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 212404
[34] Hayashi M Kim J Yamanouchi M Ohno H 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 144425
[35] Garello K Miron I M Avci C O Freimuth F Mokrousov Y Blügel S Auffret S Boulle O Gaudin G Gambardella P 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 587
[36] Zhang S Su Y Li X Li R Tian W Hong J You L 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 042401
[37] Cao J Chen Y Jin T Gan W Wang Y Zheng Y Lv H Cardoso S Wei D Lew W S 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1355
[38] Li X Li P Hou V D H Mahendra D C Nien C H Xue F Yi D Bi C Lee C M Lin S J Tsai W Suzuki Y Wang S X 2020 arXiv:2001.04054[cond-mat.mes-hall]
[39] Shi S Liang S Zhu Z Cai K Pollard S D Wang Y Wang J Wang Q He P Yu J Eda G Liang G Yang H 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 945
[40] Li P Wu W Wen Y Zhang C Zhang J Zhang S Yu Z Yang S A Manchon A Zhang X 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3990