1. IntroductionPhysical mechanisms leading to controllable and stable magnetization switching are considered as the core of spintronic devices with high performance.[1–4] In recent years, researchers have found that, by applying a current through the cross-section of a non-magnetic metal (NM)/ferromagnetic metal (FM) bilayer structure, the spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) can provide strong spin torques to switch the adjacent magnetic layer via the spin–orbit torque (SOT) effect.[5–7] This method serves as a more efficient way to switch the magnetization than the spin-transfer torque (STT) effect and is expected to inspire a variety of high-speed and multifunctional spintronic devices.[8–13]
The most common spin generators in NM/FM bilayers are heavy metals (HMs), such as Ta, W, Pt, Hf, since bulk SOIs in heavier elements are much more significant.[14,15] However, the effective spin Hall angle of HM is limited, leading to a relatively high critical magnetization switching current density jsw on the order of 1011–1012 A/m.[5–7,15] Furthermore, with regard to certain high-performance bulk magnets, such as ferrimagnetic alloys,[8] Heusler alloys,[16] magnetic insulators,[17] featuring a larger thickness, jsw is expected to be further increased to get over the augmenting anisotropic energy barrier. These facts seriously hinder the realization of low power consumption. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate novel NM materials with larger such as topological insulators (TIs),[18–20] two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG),[21,22] oxidized HMs,[23,24] and so on. Among those materials, TIs (including Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, Bi0.9Sb0.1, (BiSb)2Te3) exhibit great potential for application, thanks to the large SOTs induced by the spin–momentum locking on their surfaces at room temperature. For instance, a several-nm-thick magnetic layer can be switched by SOTs from Bi2Se3 or Bi0.9Sb0.1 with a jsw of 1010 A/m,[19,20,25] while with (BiSb)2Te3, jsw could even be reduced to the order of 109 A/m.[26] Note that all those reported TI samples are grown on single-crystal substrates with an ultra-precise growing method of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) to form excellent topological surface states (TSS). This method is acceptable at laboratory level, but incompatible with industrial memory or logic fabrication process. To resolve this obstacle, sputtered Bi2Se3 films on oxidized silicon substrate are recently reported to possess a great and can efficiently switch the adjacent ferromagnet at room temperature.[27,28] Magnetron sputtering is commonly used in semiconductor industry and therefore offers a possibility to introduce typical TI-related chalcogenides with enhanced SOT into large-scale application. Nevertheless, few similar materials are reported so far to maintain large through this method.
In this paper, we report that Bi2Te3 films sputtered on oxidized silicon substrate can exhibit a remarkable SOT effect. By applying harmonic Hall measurement in Bi2Te3/CoTb bilayer, in this system is determined as large as 3.3± 0.3 at room temperature. Then, current-induced switching of a 6-nm-thick perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) CoTb ferrimagnetic alloy is also realized in the mentioned structure. Compared with traditional HMs, jsw as well as the power consumption to switch the magnetic layer can be reduced by more than one order.
3. Result and discussionFigure 2(a) shows the fabricated device with gold electrodes and the basic electrical measurement schematic. The anomalous Hall effect (AHE) resistance versus the applied out-of-plane magnetic field is plotted in Fig. 2(b). Squared loop and similar coercive field confirm that the stack maintains its as-deposited magnetic properties. Figure 2(c) plots the curves of the first and the second harmonic voltages, i.e., R1ω and Rx(y), 2ω versus the in-plane magnetic field Hx(y). A ratio coefficient Bx(y) could be firstly calculated with the respective curvature of R1ω and the slope of Vx(y), 2ω[34,35]
Then, the damping-like
HDL and field-like effective field
HFL can be determined by the following expression:
[34,35]
where
ξ is the ratio of planar Hall resistance
RPHE and AHE resistance
RAHE. The measured
RPHE in our samples is about 0.06 Ω, which is much smaller than
RAHE and thus can be negligible. In this occasion,
HDL(FL) ≈ –2
Bx(y). Moreover, it also should be noticed that
Rx,2ω induced by the field along
x axis is much larger than
Ry,2ω induced by the field along
y axis, even if
Ry,2ω is amplified by 3 times in Fig.
2(c). This phenomenon indicates that the induced
HFL is negligible compared to the induced
HDL; for this reason, we concentrate on the damping-like SOT effect in the following discussion.
Figure 2(d) shows the calculated HDL as a function of applied charge current density jc in the Bi2Te3 layer. Here, jc is calculated by a parallel circuit model of Bi2Te3/CoTb bilayer, which can be written as
where
ρCoTb,
ρBi2Te
3,
tCoTb,
tBi2Te
3,
wHall Bar and
I represent the resistivity of CoTb, resistivity of Bi
2Te
3, thickness of CoTb, thickness of Bi
2Te
3, width of Hall bar, and injected current, respectively.
HDL augments linearly with the increasing current density, revealing that Joule heating effect is negligible in the measured current density range.
[32] In the investigated Bi
2Te
3/CoTb sample, the determined current-induced SOT efficiency
χ (defined by
HDL /
jc) is 8.7± 0.9 Oe/(10
9 A/m
2). Although the applied CoTb is far from its magnetic compensation point, the obtained value is surprisingly high. For comparison,
χ in W/CoTb/AlO
x structure in our previous work is about 0.4 ± 0.04 Oe/(10
9 A/m
2),
[8] while
χ in a conventional Ta/CoFeB/MgO structure is 0.2–0.9 Oe/(10
9 A/m
2).
[36,37] This outstanding
χ indicates that strong SOTs are expected in the sputtered Bi
2Te
3 layer. We also calculate the
in this system by the following expression:
[30–33]
where
tCoTb is thickness of CoTb. The obtained
, which exceeds 100 % and is competitive with the results in MBE-grown TIs.
[18–20] In addition, it is worth mentioning that there might be spin loss at the interface between Bi
2Te
3 and CoTb. Given this fact, even a larger intrinsic spin Hall angle could be expected in our sputtered Bi
2Te
3 films.
Current-induced magnetization switching at room temperature is demonstrated as well and plotted in Figs. 3(a) and 3(d). Here, a series of 0.1-ms-width current pulses are applied to switch the magnet, while a 400 Oe in-plane magnetic field is used to break the magnetization precession symmetry. The jsw to switch 6-nm-thick CoTb is about 9.7×109 A/m2. This value is one or two orders lower than that in typical HM-based heterostructure,[5–8] confirming again the existence of strong SOTs in the sputtered Bi2Te3. When the direction of the applied in-plane field is reversed, the switching polarity of the curve changes as expected in the theoretical SOT switching framework. We also notice that the variation of SOT-driven RAHE (∼ 1.6 Ω) is smaller than that of magnetic-field-driven RAHE (∼ 2.1 Ω), revealing a partial switching phenomenon (76 % magnetization). This difference is also observed in previous switching results with MBE-grown TIs and can be explained by the Joule-heating-caused demagnetization in CoTb layer.[26] We are convinced that reducing shunting current in CoTb layer by reasonable device design could efficiently eliminate the problem.
To better evaluate the SOT performance of the sputtered Bi2Te3 sample, some control samples based on conventional sputtered SOT sources (Pt, Ta, W) are also studied with a stack structure of HM (5 nm)/CoTb (4 nm). While maintaining the same chemical composition and Ms, the thickness of CoTb is reduced in these samples, since SOTs originating from common HMs can hardly switch magnets with large thickness. As shown in Figs. 3(b)–3(d), all the control samples have squared RAHE loops versus perpendicular magnetic field, indicating that they possess good PMA properties. Besides, because of the different shunting effects of Bi2Te3, Pt, Ta, and W, RAHE in the four samples are not consistent. Figures 3(f)–3(h) illustrate the current-induced magnetization switching curves of Pt/CoTb, Ta/CoTb, and W/CoTb samples. In these experiments, the applied in-plane magnetic field is fixed to + 400 Oe to guarantee a more reasonable comparison. We observe similar RAHE in current-induced switching and field-induced switching for each sample, revealing that the aforementioned partial switching phenomenon barely exists in HM based samples. Regarding the calculation of current density, the resistivity of Pt, Ta, and W is measured to be 27 μΩ⋅cm, 112 μΩ⋅cm, and 151 μΩ⋅cm, respectively. We find that the values of jsw to switch 4-nm-CoTb for Pt, Ta, and W are approximately 5.5×1011 A/m2, 2.3 × 1011 A/m2, and 1.7×1011 A/m2. All those critical current densities are consistent with previously reported values[5–8] and are obviously much larger than those in our Bi2Te3/CoTb system, although CoTb in Bi2Te3 based sample is even thicker, i.e., 6 nm. Note that, under an in-plane field with fixed direction, the switching polarity in Bi2Te3 sample is in line with that in Ta or W samples, which is opposite to that in Pt sample. This SOT polarity characteristic indicates that our sputtered Bi2Te3 possesses the same spin Hall angle sign as Ta and W, but is opposite to Pt. Nevertheless, this phenomenon is in contradiction with SOTs in previous-reported Bi-based materials: both MBE-grown TIs and sputtered Bi2Se3 films are demonstrated to have the same sign as Pt.[19,20,25–27] The origin of this difference will be discussed subsequently. In our work, values of of Pt, Ta, and W in Fig. 4(a) are determined as 0.07± 0.007, 0.14± 0.01, and 0.18± 0.02, through previously mentioned harmonic measurement and Eq. (4). In accordance with the varying jsw values in those SOT materials, these calculated values are quite reliable and accepted in our following discussion.
Essentially, improving the magnetization switching energy efficiency is the eventual goal of obtaining higher . Considering that the resistivity of our sputtered Bi2Te3 is similar to that of MBE-grown TIs and can be dozens, even hundreds of times higher than that of conventional HMs, we think that it is significant to figure out whether the sputtered Bi2Te3 indeed offers energy superiority by calculating the switching power consumption P. Basically, P to switch the magnetization of CoTb per unit volume with different SOT sources can be analyzed by a heat dissipation formula[27]
where
ρSOT source is the resistivity of the certain SOT source material. As shown by orange bars in Fig.
4(b), the power consumption for Bi
2Te
3 in this model is 3.7 %, 3.2 %, and 3.9 % of that for Pt, Ta, and W, indicating that sputtered Bi
2Te
3 is a low-power SOT source. Furthermore, since
theoretically, another formula is considered as well to confirm the results
[19]
Black bars in Fig.
4(b) reveal that, although the calculated power of Pt, Ta, W with Eq. (
5) varies in a possible range compared to those values with Eq. (
4), the sputtered Bi
2Te
3 material still shows the best energy efficiency performance (2.8 %, 3.5 %, and 4.3 % of that for Pt, Ta, and W).
Last but not least, we will discuss about the origin of the strong SOTs in the sputtered Bi2Te3 films. In MBE-grown TIs, SOTs basically come from the spin–momentum locking in TSS. Thus, great surface quality is the basic precondition to gain large . However, good TSS definitely will not appear in the deposited Bi2Te3 films, since magnetron sputtering is a rapid and rough growing method. Generally, there are two possible reasons to answer this question: 1) sputtered Bi chalcogenides could possibly possess nanoscale grain structure. Some ab initio calculation results suggest that this reduced dimensionality may contribute to the non-equilibrium spin accumulation driven by intraband Edelstein effect.[27] 2) It is also possible that remarkable SOIs already exist in the sputtered Bi2Te3 films with relatively high resistivity and heavy elements. To further analyze the possible origin, an important point is that, the observed spin Hall angle sign of our sputtered Bi2Te3 films is opposite to that in MBE-grown TIs (same as Pt). Another recent work also reports a similar result: sputtered WxTe1 – x films possess opposite spin Hall angle sign to WTe2 single crystals.[38–40] However, for related Se-based material, the sputtered Bi2Se3 films have the same spin Hall angle to the MBE-grown Bi2Se3.[27,28] Those evidences indicate that sputtered Te-based films probably exhibit different SOT mechanisms to sputtered Se-based films, although they both belong to the Bi chalcogenide class. Besides, the opposite spin Hall angle signs of sputtered Bi2Te3 and MBE-grown Bi2Te3 also exclude the possibility of major origin from TSS. Therefore, considering that both sputtered Te-based materials[38] and Bi-based chalcogenides[27] are reported to have obvious thickness-dependent spin Hall angle, the second reason attached to intrinsic bulk spin Hall effect is more convincing from our perspective.